I found the
debate over whether differentiated instruction could actually be doing students
a disservice by making things too easy for them an interesting one. In the face
of mounting pressure for traditional academic success and exceptance to top colleges,
a lot of emphasis is placed on independence and personal achievement. While
these are undoubtably positive elements of education, they can sometimes make
learning an isolating experience for students and unintentially do away with
some of the collabortive and creative elements of education. Differentiated
instruction brings these factors back and shows how teacher involvement and
diverse instruction can bring about those desired results while allowing
students to become well-rounded learners capable of adapting to varied learning
situations. Paying close attention the ways that differentiated instruction
affects students both in and outside of the classroom is a skill that I will
bring into the classroom with me. Everything teachers do has the ability to
have long-term effects on a student, and this is something that it is extremely
important to remember. I also learned a lot about how differentiated
instruction really is necessary for a successful classroom. Up until now, I
think we were sort of given the impression that it was only used from time to
time, or pulled out of the teacher tool box during difficult situations. But so
much of what teachers do on a daily basis is differentiated by nature, without
having to attach a label to it. Effective teaching requires instructors to
constantly evolve and adapt their methods, often right in the moment and
without time for extensive preparation. These intrinsic skills are a big
portion of what differentiated instruction is all about, and that makes the
whole thing seem a lot less intimidating.
No comments:
Post a Comment